|

|
QUANTIFICATION
OF COMPLIANCE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|

|
Authors:
|

|
TT Lahdes-Vasama, EF
Wahl*
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|

|
Institution:
|

|
Hospital for Children
and Adolescents, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland *
Clark Morrison Children's Urological Clinic, Dept. Of Urology, UCLA
School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aims of Study
To show practical graphical and mathematical methods for quantifying detrusor
compliance from cystometrography (cmg) plots of detrusor pressure versus volume
infused.
Methods
The graphical method is based on cmg curve, where detrusor pressure is plotted
against infused bladder volume. The technique consists of laying a parallel
ruler from the origin of the plot parallel to the averaged detrusor e.g. relaxed
pressure line (excluding the uninhibited contractions) and reading the pressure
intercept at the VCap,Norm, which is obtained from estimating graphs or equations
(1) as a function of age, sex, height and weight. This reading is divided by
6cmw and the resulting value is called quantifying dimensionless number Nwahl
(2). Mathematically the same result is achieved by taking the volumes and pressures
at any two points from the averaged pressure plot line and calculating Nwahl
by [(P2 - P1)/6] / [(V2-V1)/(VCap,Norm)]. Rather than trying to make an estimate
of artifacts and the averaged "relaxed" detrusor pressure line, a better method
for calculating Nwahl is to use the automated system developed for this purpose
(3,4) . But the method described here is useful for checking and understanding
the automated results. This was applied to 20 cmgs of various diagnoses [frequency
(1), day-time or mixed wetting (6), Hinman bladder (1), bladder extrophy (1),
urethral valve (1), menincomyelocele (mmc, 10 of which 2 augmented)]. The tested
patients were of different ages and sizes.
Results
Three patients, one with frequency and two with wetting problems, had completely
normal cmg with Nwahl ranging 0.4 - 1.4. The bladder compliance was varying
considerably between the wetting patients, Nwahl value being in average 2.5
(range 0.4-7.5). Three patients with abnormal, non-neurogenic bladders presented
cmgs with minimal detrusor instability but poor compliance (Nwahl ranging 4.3-9.6).
All neurogenic bladders were hyperreflexive, but their compliance was varying
from normal for younger patients to highly abnormal for the older children.
Conclusions
Given a cmg plot of pressure versus volume, this methodology yields a result
which is standardized to a patient's age and size. By these methods the results
are not much affected by such factors as short test time due to strong urge
or overactivity of the detrusor, both distorting the test results when using
the usual equation of [(V2-V1)/(p2-p1)] between two points on cmg. Thus, this
calculation is convenient for comparing compliance between patients and between
serial tests for the same patient. Consequently, this method is a valuable tool
when choosing a right treatment or assessing a treatment efficacy and timing
for a patient.
References:
1. Estimation of bladder capacity and glomerular filtration rate from birth
on. Submitted to Neurourology and Urodynamics, March 2000.
2. Quantification of bladder compliance by a dimensionless number. Submitted
to Neurourology and Urodynamics, February 2000.
3. Quantification of detrusor compliance and contractility, Society for Urological
Engineering, AUA annual meeting, 1998.
4. Quantification of detrusor compliance and contractility submitted to Neurourology
and Urodynamics, March 2000.
5. A prototype pediatric cystometric apparatus of improved accuracy. Submitted
J Endourology, February, 2000. .