SURVEY OF URODYNAMIC EXAMINATIONS: RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER STUDY ON 915 PTS

 

Authors:

G.Tuccitto1, E.Andretta2, G.Signorelli2, G.Anselmo1, S.Callari4, G.Mazza4 C.Camuffo5, S. Guazzieri5, A.D'Amico7, G.Mobilio7, G. Pezzotti6, S. Cosciani Cunico6, E. Mami3, W. Artibani3, G.Olivo9, A. Lotto9, E. Ostardo8, A. Garbeglio8, G. Giardiello10, D. Como10, F. De Seta10

   

Institution:

(1)"Osp. Ca' Foncello" Treviso, (2) "Osp. Civile" Dolo, (3) Policlinico di Modena, (4) "Osp. Civile" Gorizia, (5) "Osp. Civile" Belluno, (6) "Spedali Civili" Brescia, (7) "Osp. Borgo Roma" Verona, (8) "A.O. S.Maria degli Angeli" Pordenone, (9) Osp. di Legnago, (10) Medtronic Italia

     

Conference:

ICS 2000 Tampere

       

Type:

Read by Title Abstracts

         

Category:

Urodynamics

                 

Aims of study:
To monitor the activities of urodynamic laboratories and assess the prevalence of low urinary tract symptoms and disturbance in patients who undergo urodynamic examination (UE).

Methods:
From June 1999 to February 2000 data of 915 consecutives patients (Male 31.7%, female 68.3%, mean age 57.5±14.9 yrs, range 6-89) who underwent UE was collected using a standardized form. The data collected concerned personal identification data, referring physicians, date of appearance and type of urinary symptoms and other pelvic symptoms, preliminary examinations, UE performed, urodynamic findings, other test suggested.

Results:
The pts were referred to UE by: urologist 76%, gynaecologist 13.1%, general practitioner 2.8%, neurologist 2.3%, physiatrician 2.3%, colorectal surgeon 1.2%, others 2.3%.

Prevalence of main symptoms

 

Incontinence

Urgency/Frequency

Retention

Prolapse

Other

Neurogenic bladder

%

21

10

8

3

4

4

 Prevalence of associated symptoms

 

Prolapse and other symptom

Incontinence and other symptom

Retention and other symptom

Urgency/frequency and other symptoms

Other

%

15

12

9

8

6

 

Mean time between appearance of symptoms and first visit was 2.7 yrs Correlated pelvic symptoms were present in 171 out of 915 (18%) - fecal incontinence 44pts, constipation 71pts, pelvic pain 18pts, sexual dysfunction 38pts -. Preliminary evaluation: 864 pts (94%) underwent morfologic evaluation (xray, ultrasound), 431 (47%) complete a micturition diary, 689 (75%) had had a recent urine analysis. UE has been performed in 874pts (96.1%). In 41 pts the UE hasn't been performed: in 23 for lack of preliminary exams, 12 refused the UE, 6 for other reasons.

 

Prevalence of urodinamics findings (not mutually exclusive)

 

 

Detrusor Instability

Sphincter deficiency

Transmission defect

Obstruction

Other

Detrusor hypo/

acontractilty

Hype-

reflexia

Normal Function

Urgency

Compliance modification

Detrusor

Hypo/

Areflexia

N

223

188

152

140

124

97

90

82

75

70

43

Overall

17,4%

14,6%

12%

11%

9,7%

7,6%

7%

6,4%

5,8%

5,5%

3%

Male

18%

5%

0%

21%

10%

13%

15%

3%

3%

6%

6%

Female

17%

19%

18%

6%

10%

5%

3%

8%

7%

5%

2%

Conclusions:
This survey allowed us to estimate the prevalence of urinary disturbance in the population who underwent UE. Only 41 pts did not undergo UE which shows good patient selection. Apart from urologists and gynaecologists, few other specialists are in the habit of referring patients to UE. The time gap of 2.7 yrs between symptoms onset and medical consultation could be explained by the embarassement felt by patients when discussing bladder dysfunction symptoms. We were disappointed that only 47% completed a micturition diary. The present survey is a result of a collaborative multicenter study that will help lead to a standardization in urodynamic evaluation and provide suggestions as ways of improving quality and organizing of the urodynamic laboratory.