|

|
COLLABORATION
BETWEEN UROLOGISTS AND GYNECOLOGISTS IN THE TREATMENT OF URINARY
INCONTINENCE AND PELVIC FLOOR PROLAPSE
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|

|
Authors:
|

|
S. Madjar, D. Evans,
R.C. Duncan, and A.E. Gousse.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|

|
Institution:
|

|
University of Miami,
Florida, USA.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aims of Study:
Both urologists and gynecologists are involved in the care for women with urinary
incontinence (UI) and pelvic floor prolapse (PFP). This study is designed to
characterize the collaboration between these professionals in the treatment
of UI and PFP.
Methods:
A 14-question survey was mailed to the International Continence Society (ICS)
members. Questions dealt with professional training, type of practice, volume
of UI and PFP procedures, preferred procedures for the treatment of UI and PFP,
and extent of collaboration.
Results:
Among the 229 responders (34.4% response rate), 63.7% are urologists and 36.2%
are gynecologists. Collaboration in the operating room was reported by 50.7%
of the responders. Collaboration significantly correlated with the specialty
(70.6% of urologists but only 44.6% of gynecologists collaborated with the other
professional), and with the country of practice (collaboration was more frequent
in North America), with p values of .004 for both variables. Collaboration in
the operating room was reported mainly in procedures for the correction of vaginal
vault prolapse or enterocele, and hysterectomy. No correlation was found between
collaboration and the time dedicated to UI and PFP, the volume of surgeries
performed, UI and PFP fellowship training, university hospital affiliation,
and years in practice. Reasons for not collaborating in the operating room included
familiarity with all or most of the anti-incontinence and pelvic floor reconstruction
procedures (44.5%), unavailability of the other professional (6.1%), and reimbursement
problems (3.1%). Collaborations in basic research, clinical research, and diagnosing
challenging cases, were reported by 41.8%, 70.3% and 76.4% of responders, respectively.
Conclusions:
While urologists and gynecologists do collaborate extensively in clinical research
and diagnosis of challenging cases, surgical collaboration is limited to procedures
traditionally performed by gynecologists. Future training programs exposing
trainees to both fields of expertise may enable better ground for collaboration
and improved care for women with UI and PFP.